Info Service on Climate Change (Apr12/01)
16 April 2012
Third World Network
hosts "Equity and Climate Change" workshop
Published in SUNS #7350 dated 16 April 2012
13 Apr (Meena Raman) -- A workshop on "Equity and Climate Change"
was held by India in New Delhi on 12 April.
Present at that meeting were representatives from the other BASIC countries
(Brazil, China and South Africa) Swaziland, Gambia, Qatar, Egypt, Saudi
Arabia, Thailand and Mauritius.
The meeting was opened by India's Minister of Environment and Forests,
Ms. Jayanthi Natarajan, who explained the rationale for India hosting
such a meeting. She said the workshop was an effort to build consensus
on issues that are critical to the climate negotiations in future.
Natarajan said that equity is one of the central issues in the climate
change negotiations and one of the key principles of the Convention
and that its importance has gone up further after the negotiations at
Durban (at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference
- UNFCCC) last year.
According to the Minister, while there is no dearth of references to
"equity" and the related principle of "CBDR" (common
but differentiated responsibility) in the Convention and the decisions
of the Conference of Parties (COP), the time has come for a definition
of the inter-relationship between the notions of equity and CBDR, and
the nature of the obligations they entail.
She recalled that at the UNFCCC meeting in Cancun, the principles of
equity and CBDR were mentioned in several decisions and the term "equitable
access to sustainable development" which was introduced captures
the notion of equity in some way but not fully. The term figures in
the context of the global peaking of emissions and not of actions or
responsibilities of the Parties.
The Minister stressed the need for a greater degree of clarity and definition
in the approach.
Referring to the effort by India to put "equity" on the agenda
of the Durban COP with the support of several countries, she said it
was agreed that a workshop on this subject be held in the next meeting
in Bonn (in May). However, a workshop should not be an end in itself,
She said the workshop in Bonn should feed into the negotiations and
help devise a strategy that can protect the interests of the developing
countries in general and sustainable growth in particular.
The importance of addressing this unresolved issue of "equity"
is even more evident when we look at the challenge of negotiations that
will begin under the Durban Platform, she said further.
The Minister recalled that under the Durban Platform, a process has
been launched that will result in a protocol, another legal instrument
or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention.
The Minister said that under the Durban Platform, there has been put
in place appropriate arrangements for the post-2020 period and also
raise ambition to meet the global goal of climate stabilization.
She said that as the outcomes have to be reached under the Convention,
the principles and provisions of the Convention have to apply. However,
the manner in which this will be done needs to be clearly articulated.
Since Parties will be discussing the structure of the Durban Platform
at the Bonn meeting, it is time that we are able to define the principle
of equity that should act as the anchor of the future arrangements,
Natarajan was of the view that this exercise required a high degree
of common analytical approach and that there could be more than one
approach to realising equity in practice.
Given the variety of the needs and the particular circumstances of various
developing countries, some effort would be required to ensure that no
developing country is particularly disadvantaged in any potential scheme
of realising equity, she added.
She said there was need to decide on an effective, scientifically consistent
and socially and economically relevant definition of equity that would
serve the interests of developing countries even while enabling the
meeting of international obligations under the Convention. She expressed
hope that the workshop will help reach fruitful conclusions on this
issue and lead towards a coordinated or common approach, if possible,
to the emerging issues.
One of the speakers at the workshop was Dr. Prodipto Ghosh, former Secretary
in the Ministry of Environment and Forests. He said that "equity"
refers to "fairness" or "ethical conduct" and public
policy must be premised on these notions. He said further that equity
applies in four areas viz. obligations in relation to greenhouse gas
mitigation; securing the interest and involvement of future generations;
adaptation to or compensation for impacts of climate change; and transfer
of finance and technology to others.
In proposing an equity norm, Ghosh said that all human beings have equal
entitlements to global environmental resources. He noted that the precise
mode of computation of per capita emissions remains to be defined.
Another equity norm was that in remedying or compensating the residual
damage (when the ultimate objective of the Convention is met), or enabling
the poor to remain within their assigned entitlements to the global
environmental resources, members of society other than the poor should
make contributions in increasing proportion to their respective capabilities.
The obligation of a country to remedy the damage depends only upon its
respective capability. Thus, a poor country, with low capability, but
high climate damage would be entitled to a transfer of resources from
others, he said.
A further norm, he said, is that in respect of harm beyond residual
damage (when the ultimate objective of the Convention is not met), those
who have exceeded their respective shares of the global environmental
resource must compensate such excess harm in proportion to the extent
to which they have exceeded their entitlements.
In another event organised by Indian organisations, TERI (the Energy
and Resources Institute) and the Climate Change Forum in New Delhi on
11 April, India's Minister of Environment and Forests elaborated on
the Durban Platform.
Natarajan said that the significance of the Durban Platform decision
lies in the fact that the arrangements are established under the Convention.
Being under the Convention implies that the arrangements are not only
applicable to all parties as they must, they should also be anchored
in the principles of the Convention. Since we have to apply the principles
of equity and CBDR in evolving these arrangements, the responsibilities/obligations
in a post-2020 arrangement will clearly need to be built on the principle
of equity and CBDR, she said further.
The Minister emphasised that irrespective of the legal form of the final
arrangements, the developing country targets under such arrangements
cannot be binding, until the principle of differentiation based on equity
is defined and the conditions implicit in such definition of equity
are met. The principle of equity will need to be elaborated through
She said further that at Durban, it was agreed that till 2020, the developing
country targets under these arrangements will be determined on the basis
of voluntary choice and with a guarantee that there will be no punitive
consequences of shortfall in these domestic targets even if they are
inscribed in an international document. There will be mutually agreed
arrangements for verification (international consultation and analysis)
of the domestic goals but the objective of such arrangements will be
only to increase transparency and build confidence in mutual actions.
She went on to elaborate further that post-2020 arrangements must therefore
include not only binding emission reduction commitments for developed
countries but also assurance that there will be no unilateral measures
taken by any country in the name of climate change. Besides, the post-2020
arrangements must include commitments of developed countries in quantified
and specific terms to provide financing and technology support to developing
countries, she added.
Further, the arrangements should provide for a facilitative regime that
ensures access to intellectual property rights (IPRs) and transfer of
climate-friendly technologies. The arrangements may take the shape of
a protocol or legal instrument, provided that the above conditions are
met, said the Minister.
Without an international consensus on equity, unilateral trade measures
and technology-related IPRs, substantial movement under the Durban Platform
will not be possible. These should be a part of an ambitious agenda
if we are serious about international cooperation on climate change,
She said that the issue of an appropriate legal form for the future
arrangements by 2020 was a matter of intense debate at Durban. Some
Parties led, in particular, by the EU pressed for a form of agreement
that should be legally binding on all Parties.
The Minister said that India has always believed that legal form should
follow the substance. A legally binding agreement, by itself, is no
guarantee for increased ambition or its implementation. She said that
some Kyoto Protocol Parties like Canada have recently made unilateral
announcements to renounce their legal obligations under the Kyoto Protocol.
This is a clear pointer to the fact that a legal form is useful only
as long as the Party is willing to abide by it.
The Minister expressed that India cannot agree to a legally binding
agreement for emissions reduction at this stage of its development.
India's emissions are bound to grow, as it has to ensure social and
economic development and fulfil the imperative of poverty eradication.
On what would be the shape of an outcome with legal force, she said
the contours of this notion will become clear in the course of negotiations.
Such an outcome may include some aspirational COP decisions, some binding
COP decisions, and setting up of new institutions and bodies. It may
even include new protocols or other legal instruments as necessary to
implement the decisions covering various issues with various degrees
of binding-ness as per domestic or international provisions of law under
the Convention. +
TO MAIN | ONLINE
BOOKSTORE | HOW TO